DVRCV Main Menu

You are here:

You are here

Profile: Scott Holmes, Baby Makes 3 facilitator

Profile: Scott Holmes, Baby Makes 3 facilitator

Close-up of the hands of a baby and new parents

This article features in the December 2018 edition of DVRCV Advocate.

Change the Story identifies new parenthood as a key transitional phase in which to address the drivers of violence against women; Baby Makes 3 accesses new parents through the maternal and child health sector.

What makes facilitating Baby Makes 3 different from any other new parent group?

Most new parent groups are focused on the practical aspects of looking after a baby – bathing, feeding and sleep. In Baby Makes 3, the complete focus is on the relationship of the parents themselves. We ask what changes occur when couples become parents and examine the positive and negative ways these changes will impact on their relationship. How will they respond to these changes, and what skills and knowledge might they need to navigate this particularly stressful and very new time in their lives? In particular, Baby Makes 3 is concerned with the ways that social expectations – both external and internalised – about parents are very different for mothers than for fathers. This can lead to imbalances in the relationship that, if not attended to, can lead to conflict and even relationship breakdown. Baby Makes 3 works to help parents identify this possibility and hopefully prevent the conflict before it occurs and supports them to engage in a more gender equitable relationship.

Why is there a need for specialist facilitators to do this work?

Although Baby Makes 3 takes a very gentle and interactive approach to the material, it is asking parents to think about aspects of their relationship that they have often not discussed before. Although people may have some familiarity with thinking about gender stereotypes, gender roles and gender inequality, it is rare that couples have thought about them from a personal angle. Facilitators need to be skilled to create a safe space where people can participate and consider different ways of negotiating and living their relationship. In addition, the content itself is highly nuanced and requires facilitators with a thorough understanding of the way that gender is performed and reinforced across our society, particularly in relation to parenting.

Have you witnessed any particular moments or changes in participants that embody the aim?

One of the things I love about Baby Makes 3 is that there are almost always ‘ah ha!’ moments in which you can see the participants suddenly realise there is a whole way of looking at life they hadn’t seen before. This often happens when we discuss the social expectations that there are for mothers and fathers. This exercise exposes the heavy burden of ‘getting it right’ that many mothers experience compared to the lighter burden of ‘look at me. I’m a dad’ that many fathers experience. For many men, this is the first time they have really understood the psychological and emotional burden their partners are experiencing, as well as the practical burden. Another ‘ah ha’ moment is when we explore whether the father ‘helping’ the mother is really the same as genuinely sharing in the responsibilities that come with parenting. Many men have not yet quite realised that the mothers want more than just a helping hand and that they have a fuller, more equal role to play in a relationship where they are a parent.

Can you describe a time when you’ve challenged traditional gender roles with participants and met with resistance? How did you respond?

There is nearly always resistance! Many men and women look around at the world and believe that things have improved for women and think that the problem of gender has been solved. When we suggest that perhaps it is not that simple there is often push back, and not just from the men. We are all deeply invested in the way we have ‘normally’ performed our gender, and any suggestion that this might need to change can be challenging. I usually find the best way to respond is to acknowledge their point of view as valid, but to still present the reasons why another point of view might be more relevant. I also think it is good to allow the other participants to be engaged in the resistance. “What do others think?” is one of the most useful questions in the facilitators tool kit. Ultimately, you can’t change another person, all you can do is create a space where areas that need changing can be brought to the surface in a way that allows for curiosity and reflection. What happens when the participants leave the room is in their hands.

This article features in the December 2018 edition of The Advocate. Download article (PDF)